New York:Įstrategias de afrontamiento: consideraciones críticas First citation in article Google ScholarĪssessments in clinical trials (pp.391-417). First citation in article Crossref, Google ScholarĬhronic disease. First citation in article Crossref, Google ScholarĤ71. Health-related quality of life in patients with chronic obstructiveġ878. First citation in article Crossref, Google ScholarĪ novel, short, and simple questionnaire to measure Quality of life in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonaryĪmerican Journal of Respiratory and Critical Careħ90.
First citation in article Google ScholarĬomparison of discriminative properties amongĭisease-specific questionnaires for measuring health-related Measurements in clinical trials: Choosing the appropiateĪssessments in clinical trials (pp.37-46). First citation in article Crossref, Google Scholar QLQ-C30 in assessing the quality of life of patients with a symptomaticħ7. The feasibility, reliability and validity of the EORTC First citation in article Crossref, Google Scholarĩ91. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 184–ġ95. Situational coping and coping dispositions in a stressful Using quantitative and qualitative methods.ĩ95. Quality of life after pulmonary rehabilitation: Assessing change Perfil de Conducta de Enfermedad en pacientes con crisis deĪngustia ‘Illness behavior profile of panicĪnálisis y Modificación de Conducta, 19, 233–Ģ65. The effect of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease on qualityĥ56. La “Escala de Modos de Coping” ‘Coping measure:Ģ6. La medida del afrontamiento: revisión crítica de Some implications of the results are discussed. Coping had the greatest difficulty differentiating among persons suffering from different diseases the efficiency to predict an affective state was poor in IB, C, and HQL.
Stepwise multiple regression analyses were performed to identify the concepts and the scales that could best predict anxiety and depression. Discriminant analysis was performed to study the discriminative properties of concepts the eigenvalues were 3.470 (IB), 0.989 (C) and 5.591 (HQL). Three groups of patients (ambulatory chronic obstructive pulmonary disease ‘COPD’ patients, hospitalized COPD patients, and surgical lung cancer patients) were evaluated on the basis of these concepts using three standard questionnaires. Nevertheless, there are doubts about their ability to discriminate among groups of patients and to predict anxiety and depression levels in some medical settings.
The concepts of illness behavior (IB), coping (C), and health-related quality of life (HQL) are commonly used in the health field.
0 kommentar(er)
